Parole granted to 113 prisoners from Sabarmati Central Jail on occasion of Diwali
33 prisoners granted special and 80 prisoners granted regular parole; released for 14 days
By Capital Kranti desk, Gandhinagar · Editor: Parth Thakkar
6 November 2026, 12:27 pm · Updated 12:36 pm · 1 min read
This story was written by AI from the sources listed below; every claim and number in it was checked against them before it went up. How we check
According to a report by Sandesh, the administration of Ahmedabad's Sabarmati Central Jail has adopted a humanitarian approach and granted parole to a total of 113 prisoners so that they can celebrate the festivals of Diwali and the New Year with their families. All these prisoners have been given temporary release for a period of 14 days.
In this release, 33 prisoners have been granted a special 'Diwali Special Parole', which includes 26 male and 7 female prisoners. According to the rules for special parole, only those prisoners who have only 1 crime registered in their name and whose conduct during their time in jail has remained good were selected. Furthermore, priority has been given to senior citizen prisoners over 60 years of age among the male prisoners.
Apart from these 33 prisoners who received special parole, another 80 prisoners have been granted regular parole leaves based on their eligibility. Thus, a total of 113 prisoners will be able to share the joy of the festival with their loved ones.
The jail administration has clarified that after the completion of this 14-day period, all prisoners must mandatorily report back to Sabarmati Central Jail at the scheduled time.
Heavy rush at Vadodara ST depot despite extra buses before Diwali
Thousands of passengers stranded on platforms for hours as buses run housefull
101 new GSRTC buses launched from Gandhinagar ahead of Diwali
Deputy Chief Minister Harsh Sanghavi flagged off the new buses, employees to get half-month's salary in advance.
Maninagar builder sells mortgaged shop, defrauds factory owner of ₹1.10 crore
Case registered against builder and his son; accused of selling mortgaged shop and using funds for personal work